Standings

CONFERENCE > STREAKS AND LAST 10 10
CONFERENCE DIVISION POWER RANKINGS

Go To Glossary

Updated as of 05/23/13

HOME | STREAKS AND LAST 10 | MARGIN AND STATISTICS | AHEAD AND BEHIND
EASTERN  CONFERENCE
EASTERN W-L CURRENT STRK HOME STRK ROAD STRK WIN STRK LOSS STRK L 10 L 10 HOME L 10 ROAD PF PA DIFF
1 e Miami 66-16 Won 8 Won 5 Won 5 Won 27 Lost 2 9-1 9-1 9-1 102.9 95.0 7.9
2 a New York 54-28 Won 1 Won 10 Lost 1 Won 13 Lost 4 8-2 10-0 7-3 100.0 95.7 4.3
3 c Indiana 49-32 Lost 3 Lost 2 Lost 2 Won 5 Lost 3 5-5 5-5 5-5 94.7 90.7 4.0
4 x Brooklyn 49-33 Won 2 Won 4 Lost 1 Won 7 Lost 5 7-3 6-4 6-4 96.9 95.1 1.8
5 x Chicago 45-37 Won 2 Won 2 Won 1 Won 3 Lost 3 5-5 7-3 4-6 93.2 92.9 0.3
6 x Atlanta 44-38 Lost 2 Lost 1 Lost 1 Won 6 Lost 4 4-6 5-5 4-6 98.0 97.5 0.5
7 x Boston 41-40 Lost 1 Lost 1 Lost 1 Won 7 Lost 6 4-6 6-4 2-8 96.5 96.7 -0.2
8 x Milwaukee 38-44 Won 1 Lost 1 Won 1 Won 4 Lost 5 3-7 5-5 1-9 98.9 100.4 -1.5
o Philadelphia 34-48 Won 1 Won 1 Won 1 Won 3 Lost 7 5-5 7-3 5-5 93.2 96.5 -3.3
o Toronto 34-48 Won 5 Won 4 Won 2 Won 5 Lost 6 7-3 6-4 4-6 97.2 98.7 -1.5
o Detroit 29-53 Lost 1 Won 3 Lost 1 Won 4 Lost 10 5-5 3-7 3-7 94.9 98.8 -3.9
o Washington 29-53 Lost 6 Lost 2 Lost 8 Won 4 Lost 12 3-7 8-2 2-8 93.2 95.8 -2.6
o Cleveland 24-58 Lost 6 Lost 3 Lost 3 Won 3 Lost 10 2-8 2-8 1-9 96.5 101.2 -4.7
o Charlotte 21-61 Won 3 Won 3 Lost 14 Won 3 Lost 18 4-6 8-2 0-10 93.4 102.7 -9.3
o Orlando 20-62 Lost 3 Lost 2 Lost 12 Won 4 Lost 12 2-8 3-7 0-10 94.1 101.1 -7.0
 
WESTERN CONFERENCE
WESTERN W-L CURRENT STRK HOME STRK ROAD STRK WIN STRK LOSS STRK L 10 L 10 HOME L 10 ROAD PF PA DIFF
1 w Oklahoma City 60-22 Lost 1 Lost 1 Won 5 Won 12 Lost 3 7-3 7-3 7-3 105.7 96.5 9.2
2 sw San Antonio 58-24 Lost 3 Lost 1 Lost 7 Won 11 Lost 3 3-7 8-2 2-8 103.0 96.6 6.4
3 x Denver 57-25 Won 3 Won 23 Won 1 Won 15 Lost 3 8-2 10-0 7-3 106.1 101.1 5.0
4 p L.A. Clippers 56-26 Won 7 Won 4 Won 3 Won 17 Lost 4 7-3 8-2 5-5 101.1 94.6 6.5
5 x Memphis 56-26 Won 2 Won 1 Won 3 Won 8 Lost 3 8-2 9-1 5-5 93.4 89.3 4.1
6 x Golden State 47-35 Won 2 Won 1 Won 1 Won 5 Lost 6 6-4 6-4 4-6 101.2 100.3 0.9
7 x L.A. Lakers 45-37 Won 5 Won 6 Won 1 Won 5 Lost 6 8-2 9-1 5-5 102.2 101.0 1.2
8 x Houston 45-37 Lost 2 Won 1 Lost 3 Won 5 Lost 7 6-4 7-3 4-6 106.0 102.5 3.5
o Utah 43-39 Lost 1 Won 1 Lost 1 Won 5 Lost 4 7-3 7-3 3-7 98.0 98.1 -0.1
o Dallas 41-41 Won 1 Won 1 Won 3 Won 4 Lost 6 6-4 6-4 7-3 101.1 101.7 -0.6
o Portland 33-49 Lost 13 Lost 8 Lost 5 Won 5 Lost 13 0-10 2-8 2-8 97.5 100.7 -3.2
o Minnesota 31-51 Won 1 Lost 1 Won 1 Won 4 Lost 6 5-5 5-5 4-6 95.7 98.1 -2.4
o Sacramento 28-54 Lost 4 Lost 1 Lost 3 Won 3 Lost 6 2-8 4-6 3-7 100.2 105.1 -4.9
o New Orleans 27-55 Lost 5 Lost 2 Lost 3 Won 4 Lost 11 2-8 5-5 1-9 94.1 97.9 -3.8
o Phoenix 25-57 Lost 1 Won 1 Lost 2 Won 4 Lost 10 2-8 2-8 1-9 95.2 101.6 -6.4
 

x -Clinched Playoffs Berth | e -Clinched Eastern Conference| a -Clinched Atlantic Division | c -Clinched Central Division |
se -Clinched Southeast Division | w -Clinched Western Conference | sw -Clinched Southwest Division |
nw -Clinched Northwest Division | p -Clinched Pacific Division | o -Eliminated From Playoffs contention

TIEBREAKER BASIS:

(-) Tie breaker not needed (better overall winning percentage)
(1) Division leader wins tie from team not leading a division
(2) Head-to-head won-lost percentage
(3) Division won-lost percentage
(4) Conference won-lost percentage
(5) W-L Percentage vs. Playoff teams, own conference
(6) W-L Percentage vs. Playoff teams, other conference
(7) Net Points, all games

Playoff Tie-Break Procedures:

Teams 1 to 4 in each conference are the three division winners and the team with the next best regular-season record, with the seeding of these four teams determined by regular-season record. The playoffs seedings of Teams 5 to 8 are based upon regular-season record. Ties are broken pursuant to the rules set forth below.

Ties for playoff positions (including division winners) will be broken utilizing the criteria set forth in subparagraph a. below (in the case of ties involving two teams) and subparagraph b. below (in the case of ties involving more than two teams), and the guidelines set forth in subparagraph c. below.

a. Two Teams Tied b. More Than Two Teams Tied
(1) Better winning percentage in games against each other. (1) Better winning percentage in all games among the tied teams.
(2) Better winning percentage against teams in own division (only if tied teams are in same division). (2) Better winning percentage against teams in own division (only if all tied teams are in the same division).
(3) Better winning percentage against teams in own conference. (3) Better winning percentage against teams in own conference.
(4) Better winning percentage against teams eligible for playoffs in own conference (including teams that finished the regular season tied for a playoff position). (4) Better winning percentage against teams eligible for playoffs in own conference (including teams that finished the regular season tied for a playoff position).
(5) Better winning percentage against teams eligible for playoffs in opposite conference (including teams that finished the regular season tied for a playoff position). (5) Better net result of total points scored less total points allowed against all opponents ("point differential").
(6) Better net result of total points scored less total points allowed against all opponents ("point differential").

c. Guidelines For Applying Tie-Break Criteria. The following guidelines shall be used when applying the above criteria to break ties for playoff positions:

(1) (a) Since the three division winners are guaranteed a spot in the top four, ties to determine the division winners must be broken before any other ties.
(b) When a tie must be broken to determine a division winner, the results of the tie-break shall be used to determine only the division winner and its playoff position, not any other playoff position(s).

(2) If a tie involves more than two teams, the tie-break criteria in subparagraph b. shall be applied in the order set forth therein until the first to occur of the following:
(a) Each of the tied teams has a different winning percentage or point differential under the applicable tiebreak criterion (a "complete" breaking of the tie). In this circumstance, the team with the best winning percentage or point differential under the criterion will be awarded the best playoff position, the team with the next-best winning percentage or point differential will be awarded the next-best playoff position, and so on, and no further application of the tie-break criteria will be required.

~OR~
(b) One or more (but not all) of the tied teams has a different winning percentage or point differential under the applicable tie-break criterion (a "partial" breaking of the tie). In this circumstance: (x) any team(s) that performed better under the applicable criterion than any other team(s) will be awarded a higher playoff position than such other team(s); and (y) teams that had equivalent performance under the applicable criterion will remain tied, and such remaining tie(s) will be broken by applying, from the beginning, the criteria in subparagraph a.(1)-(6) above (for any remaining tie involving only two teams) or subparagraph b.(1)-(5) above (for any remaining tie involving more than two teams) and the guidelines set forth in this subparagraph c.

(3) If application of the criteria in subparagraph a. or b. does not result in the breaking of a tie, the playoff positions of the tied teams will be determined by a random drawing.

d. Home Court Advantage:For purposes of home court advantage, ties will be broken pursuant to the procedures used for breaking two-team ties for playoff position.